Tackling Friday morning quarterbacks

When covering a murder case, the truth should not be the second victim

What’s the difference between a punching bag and a journalist? A punching bag doesn’t feel pain.

I’m still reeling from the unfair criticism that I was obliged to endure as a journalist. But it went along with the territory and I can accept that.

Like the night a city council member criticized me during a council meeting for not doing my homework. This was at a time when council members and other city officials spent every waking moment looking for ways to hide the textbooks, so to speak.

But that’s not what this rant is about. This rant is about unfair criticism posted last night on Facebook about a murder case we covered three years ago. (Yes, I realize that anything posted on Facebook should be taken with a grain of salt. But, now that I’m retired and don’t have to take this crap lying down, I feel obligated to respond.)

The Facebook post praised our competitor, an out-of-town newspaper prone to sensationalism, while taking us to task for not providing coverage supportive of the victim’s family. Mind you, I take a lot of responsibility for the coverage because I was the criminal justice reporter at the time and my input carried weight in how the story was played.

The truth is we were very supportive of the victim’s family because we made it a point not to be pushy. I gave them opportunities to comment, they declined and I left them alone with an open invitation to contact me anytime.

Yes, we got beat up by the competition and big-city TV stations on that count. I’ll take that ass-whipping any day. Sometimes it’s better not to pursue a story. Or to wait until the time is right.

Eventually, I did connect with family members and we had a touching and insightful interview. After the interview, I returned to my desk and wrote the story with tears welling in my eyes. The story speaks for itself.*

That said, my paper thoroughly covered — complete with previews — all efforts to memorialize the victim and raise funds for her family.

I’m also proud to say that, while police were searching for the perpetrator, my paper didn’t jump into the fray, recklessly reporting false leads. That includes a Columbus woman’s dubious claim that she saw the perpetrator and his car in the parking lot of her apartment complex. Police information released after the murderer was taken into custody indicated that, at the time in question, his car had been located in southwest Michigan. It had been there at least three weeks without being moved.

I’m also proud to say that, during a custody hearing connected to the case, we were not a part of the media frenzy incorrectly reporting that the perpetrator’s family had filed for custody of a child he and the victim had together. That was not the case. The motion they filed was clearly procedural and meant to protect their right to be included as participants in the case.

Few of the media outlets involved in this blatant act of sensationalism ever acknowledged the truth, made corrections or offered clarifications.

Our coverage speaks for itself. If you have a subscription to the Ashland Times-Gazette, all you need do is enter names from the case in the search box. You’ll find plenty of reliable information there.

Remembering Lynn Jackenheimer, one year later – Times-Gazette _ Ashland & Ashland County, Ohio

◊ Summerfield’s parents file motion in custody case – Times-Gazette _ Ashland & Ashland County, Ohio

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Tackling Friday morning quarterbacks

  1. I understand that this post was published on Friday morning, so that is why that day is in the title.

    But isn’t “Monday morning Quarterbacks” the correct phrase? It could be any day of the week I suppose, but the use of a different day had me wondering if the use of a non-standard phrase was referencing something other than the normal use. If I said “rumble seat driver” it would mean something different than the normal “Back seat driver”.

    Clearly Irv is missing the bricks being thrown at him while he was on the staff, so I thought he should continue to get them here on his blog.

    Liked by 1 person

    • You’re right, the phrase does imply something different, a step or so beyond Monday morning quarterbacking. I’m referring to the fact that, three years after the fact, these folks are still lashing out without any real knowledge of the facts or the inner workings of the media.
      Truth is, a simple comparison of the stories filed would dispel their allegations. I suspect many of them would respond that they can’t access the story archives because they don’t subscribe to the paper. Which is like saying, I don’t read the paper, but I dislike it.

      Like

    • I try not to be judgmental in that respect. I’m grateful that, in my family, some of us seem to have an innate grasp of linguistic skills despite our lack of formal education. People comprehend or communicate at various levels and it’s up to me to use my talents to work through that as best I can. Which is worse — a literate person who won’t understand or an illiterate person who can’t?

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s